<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Allergy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Allergy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Российский Аллергологический Журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1810-8830</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2686-682X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">607</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36691/RJA607</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">FOOD ANAPHYLAXIS IN CHILDREN: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 53 CASES</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ПИЩЕВАЯ АНАФИЛАКСИЯ У ДЕТЕЙ: РЕТРОСПЕКТИВНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ 53 СЛУЧАЕВ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Esakova</surname><given-names>N V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Есакова</surname><given-names>Н В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>env007@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pampura</surname><given-names>A N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пампура</surname><given-names>А Н</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow research Institute of pediatric and child Surgery</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Московский научно-исследовательский институт педиатрии и детской хирургии» Министерства здравоохранения России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-10-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>10</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">NO5 (2013)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">№5 (2013)</issue-title><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-03-10"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2013, Pharmarus Print Media</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2013, Фармарус Принт Медиа</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pharmarus Print Media</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Фармарус Принт Медиа</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2015-12-15"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rusalljournal.ru/raj/article/view/607">https://rusalljournal.ru/raj/article/view/607</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. There are no studies on anaphylaxis in children in Russian Federation therefore this problem is a topical issue. Background. To determine the etiology, natural course of food anaphylaxis in Russian Federation children, to analyse the therapeutic care of anaphylaxis. Methods. 53 patients with food anaphylaxis were included in the study. All patients completed a questionnaire included questions about the triggers, clinical manifestations and treatment of anaphylaxis. Results. In 94% episodes of anaphylactic reactions occurred at home, 2/3 (66%) of patients had two or more episodes of food anaphylaxis before, 5 (8%) infants didn’t have allergic diseases, 23 patients (43%) had anaphylactic reactions to more than one product. Cow’s milk (43%) was the most common cause of anaphylaxis. Cow’s milk caused anaphylaxis in 67% of children under 2 years (p&lt;0,0001). In 98% of patients target organs of anaphylactic reacnions were skin / mucous and in 87% — respiratory system. In the group of children over 2 years old cardiovascular symptoms were more often (p&lt;0,00l5). In the majority of patients delayed diagnosis of anaphylaxis more than 4 years was estimaited. Only 7% of children had the injection of adrenaline during anaphylactic reactions. Conclusion. The results of the study showed the lack of experience in investigation of anaphylaxis in the Russian Federation, which consequently leads to incorrect diagnosis and not effective treatment.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Введение. В Российской Федерации проблема анафилаксии у детей практически не освещалась, и подобные исследования исключительно актуальны. Цель исследования. Определение особенностей этиологии и клинической картины пищевой анафилаксии у детей в Российской Федерации, анализ фармакотерапевтической помощи, используемой медицинским персоналом и родителями пациентов в лечении анафилаксии. Материалы и методы. В исследование включены 53 ребенка с диагнозом «пищевая анафилаксия». Все дети анкетированы при помощи использования разработанного авторами опросника, который включал вопросы о причинах возникновения, клинических проявлениях и лечении анафилаксии. Результаты. В 94% случаев эпизоды анафилактических реакций происходили в домашних условиях,у 2/3 (66%) пациентов отмечалось два или более эпизодов пищевой анафилаксии. При анализе анамнеза пациентов у 5 (8%) детей не отмечено каких-либо аллергических заболеваний. У 23 пациентов (43%) имели место анафилактические реакции более чем к одному продукту (до 5 пищевых продуктов). Анафилаксия при употреблении коровьего молока встречалась у большего числа пациентов (43%) и развивалась достоверно чаще в группе детей до 2 лет (67%) (p&lt;0,0001). При развитии анафилактических реакций наиболее часто выявлялись симптомы со стороны кожи или слизистых (98%) и органов дыхательной системы (87%). В группе детей старше 2 лет симптомы со стороны сердечно-сосудистой системы встречались достоверно чаще (р&lt;0,0015). Задержка постановки диагноза анафилаксии у подавляющего большинства больных составила более 4 лет. Введение адреналина при купировании анафилактических реакций осуществлялось лишь у 7% детей. Заключение. Результаты проведенного исследования свидетельствуют о гиподиагностике анафилаксии у детей в Российской Федерации, что как следствие ведет к отсутствию правильного лечения, которое может оказаться решающим в спасении жизни пациента.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>anaphylaxis</kwd><kwd>food allergy</kwd><kwd>children</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>анафилаксия</kwd><kwd>пищевая аллергия</kwd><kwd>дети</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Cianferoni A., Novembre E., Mugnaini L. et al. Clinical features of acute anaphylaxis in patients admitted to a university hospital: an 11-year retrospective review (1985—1996). Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001, v. 87 (1), p. 27-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Wang J., Sampson H.A. Food anaphylaxis. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2007, v. 37 (5), p. 651-660.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Neugut A.I., Ghatak A.T., Miller R.L. Anaphylaxis in the United States: an investigation into its epidemiology. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, v. 161 (1), p. 15-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Decker W.W., Campbell R.L., Manivannan V. et al. The etiology and incidence of anaphylaxis in Rochester, Minnesota: a report from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, v. 122 (6), p. 1161-1165.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Bohlke K., Davis R.L., DeStefano F. et al. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis among children and adolescents enrolled in a health maintenance organization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, v. 113 (3), p. 536-542.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Yocum M.W., Butterfield J.H., Klein J.S. et al. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: A population-based study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1999, v. 104 (2 Pt 1), p. 452-456.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Mullins R.J. Anaphylaxis: risk factors for recurrence. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2003, v. 33 (8), p. 1033-1040.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Simons F.E., Edwards E.S., Read Jr. E.J., Clark S., Liebelt E.L. Voluntarily reported unintentional injections from epinephrine autoinjectors. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, v. 125, p. 419-423.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Novembre E., Cianferoni A., Bernardini R. et al. Anaphylaxis in children: clinical and allergologic features. Pediatrics. 1998, v. 101, E8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Mehl A., Wahn U., Niggemann B. Anaphylactic reactions in children — a questionnaire-based surveyin Germany Allergy. 2005, v. 60 (11), p. 1440-1445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>De Silva I.L., Mehr S.S., Tey D., Tang M.L. Paediatric anaphylaxis: a 5 year retrospective review. Allergy. 2008, v. 63, p. 1071-1076.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Braganza S.C., Acworth J.P., McKinnon D.R. Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006, v. 91, p. 159-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Hsin Y.C., Huang J.L., Yeh K.W. Clinical features of adult and pediatric anaphylaxis in Taiwan Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2011, v. 29 (4), p. 307-312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Huang F., Chawla K., Järvinen K.M. et al. Anaphylaxis in a New York City pediatric emergency department: Triggers, treatments, and outcomes J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, v. 129 (1), p. 162-168.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Muraro G.R., Clark A., Eigenmann P. et al. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology. Allergy. 2007, v. 62, p. 857-871.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Lieberman P., Nicklas R.A., Oppenheimer J. et al. The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 Update. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, v. 126, p. 477-480.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Boyce J.A., Assa’ad A. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, v. 126 (Suppl 1), S1-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Simons F.E., Ardusso L.R., Bilo M.B. et al. World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines: J. Allergy Clin.Immunol. 2011, v. 127, p. 587-593.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
