Clinical Efficacy and Potential Biomarkers of Response to Upadacitinib Therapy in Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Comorbidities
- Authors: Smolnikov E.V.1,2, Byazrova M.G.3,4, Litovkina A.O.1,2, Elisyutina O.G.1,2, Fedenko E.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Center – Institute of Immunology Federal Medico-Biological Agency
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- National Research Center ― Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
- Section: Case reports
- Submitted: 30.11.2025
- Accepted: 08.04.2026
- Published: 28.04.2026
- URL: https://rusalljournal.ru/raj/article/view/17090
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.36691/RJA17090
- ID: 17090
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Its pathogenesis involves key roles of Th2-cell and type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) cytokines — IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 — which activate JAK/STAT signaling pathways (primarily JAK1/STAT6). Despite the proven efficacy of JAK inhibitors, including upadacitinib, additional real-world clinical data are needed, especially in patients with refractory AD and comorbid conditions.
Aim — to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and dynamics of potential biomarkers during upadacitinib therapy in patients with severe AD and comorbid pathology.
Materials and Methods. This case series presents data from 5 adult patients with severe refractory AD who received upadacitinib 30 mg/day for 52 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by dynamics in SCORAD, EASI, IGA, NRS, DLQI, and POEM scores. Gene expression of cytokines (TARC/CCL17, MDC/CCL22, PARC/CCL18, CTACK/CCL27, eotaxin-3/CCL26, IL-4, IL-13, IL-17, IL-22, TSLP, IL-25, IL-33) was analyzed using PCR at baseline and week 16 of therapy.
Results. Disease control was achieved in all patients: by week 40, 100% of patients (5/5) achieved EASI-90 response, which was maintained until the end of the observation period. Median SCORAD decreased from 65.3 to 2.7 by week 16, while median EASI score decreased from 47.6 to 0.7 by week 28. Pruritus intensity (NRS) decreased from 5 to 1 (median) by week 16. Twenty-six mild adverse events were recorded; no serious adverse events were reported. Complete drug-induced remission was observed in one female patient with comorbid alopecia areata. No statistically significant changes were detected in the profile of the studied biomarkers.
Conclusion. In this case series, upadacitinib demonstrated high efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with severe refractory AD over 52 weeks of therapy. The observed remission of comorbid alopecia areata expands understanding of the drug's therapeutic potential. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to identify predictive biomarkers.
Full Text
About the authors
Evgeniy V. Smolnikov
National Research Center – Institute of Immunology Federal Medico-Biological Agency; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: qweril2010@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1302-4178
SPIN-code: 4874-8100
MD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowMaria G. Byazrova
National Research Center ― Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: mbyazrova@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9858-7596
SPIN-code: 4317-9042
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow
Alla O. Litovkina
National Research Center – Institute of Immunology Federal Medico-Biological Agency; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: dr.litovkina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5021-9276
SPIN-code: 2337-7930
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow
Olga G. Elisyutina
National Research Center – Institute of Immunology Federal Medico-Biological Agency; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Email: el-olga@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4609-2591
SPIN-code: 9567-1894
MD, Dr. Sci (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowElena S. Fedenko
National Research Center – Institute of Immunology Federal Medico-Biological Agency
Email: efedks@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3358-5087
SPIN-code: 5012-7242
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Clinical guidelines "Atopic dermatitis". [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/265_3. [Accessed: 24.11.2025].
- Laughter MR, Maymone MBC, Mashayekhi S, et al. The global burden of atopic dermatitis: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2017. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):304-309. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19480
- Malik K, Heitmiller KD, Czarnowicki T. An Update on the Pathophysiology of Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(3):317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2017.02.006
- Novak N, Bieber T, Leung DYM. Immune mechanisms leading to atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(6 Suppl):S128-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.032
- Thyssen JP, Halling-Overgaard AS, Andersen YMF, et al. Comorbidities of atopic dermatitis—what does the evidence say? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(5):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.12.002
- Silverberg JI. Comorbidities and the impact of atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(2):144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.021
- Zysk W, Kaczmarczyk P, Kłos A, et al. Gastrointestinal Comorbidities Associated with Atopic Dermatitis-A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):1194. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021194
- Li H, Zhang Z, Zhang H, et al. Update on the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Atopic Dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;61(3):324-338. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3
- Savva M, Kousta F, Kanni T, et al. Recent Advancements in the Atopic Dermatitis Mechanism. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2024;29(2):84. doi: 10.31083/fbl2902084
- Song A, Lee SE, Kim JH. Immunopathology and Immunotherapy of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Immune Netw. 2022;22(1):e7. doi: 10.4110/in.2022.22.e7
- Huang IH, Chung WH, Wu PC, et al. JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: An updated review. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1068260. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1068260
- Oetjen LK, Mack MR, Feng J, et al. Sensory Neurons Co-opt Classical Immune Signaling Pathways to Mediate Chronic Itch. Cell. 2017;171(1):217-228.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.006
- Amano W, Nakajima S, Kunugi H, et al. The Janus kinase inhibitor JTE-052 improves skin barrier function through suppressing signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(3):667-677.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.051
- Wollenberg A, Kinberger M, Arents B, et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(9):1409-1431. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18345
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA requires warnings about increased risk of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots, and death for JAK inhibitors that treat certain chronic inflammatory conditions. [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requires-warnings-about-increased-risk-serious-heart-related-events-cancer-blood-clots-and-death. [Accessed: 24.11.2025].
- Wang M, Gao X, Zhang L. Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase selective inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025;46(1):88-97. doi: 10.2500/aap.2025.46.24001
- Naharro-Rodríguez J, Berná-Rico E, Pérez-Bootello FJ, et. al. Real-world Experience With Upadacitinib in Adolescents and Adults With Refractory Atopic Dermatitis: A 24-week Retrospective Study. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024 Jun;115(6):615-617. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2023.07.026.
- Fomina DS, Belousova IE, Zhukova OV, et al. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib: adcare single center experience. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1345921. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345921
- Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024;14(5):1127-1144. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01163-7
- Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169-2181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2
- Irvine AD, Guttman-Yassky E, Papp KA, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025;26(6):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-01016-7
- Gooderham MJ, de Bruin-Weller MS, Laquer V, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib dose escalation and reduction in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results of a randomized blinded treat-to-target multicentre phase IIIb/IV study (Flex Up). Br J Dermatol. 2025;193(6):1101-1111. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae125
- Bunick CG, Guttman-Yassky E, Alexis AF, et al. Safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis in randomized clinical trials across 6 years. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025; [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19876
- Ma T, Liu X, Ouyang T, et al. Alopecia Areata: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapies. MedComm (2020). 2025;6(5):e70182. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70182
Supplementary files

